[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA230751416DC@IN01WEMBXA.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:32:04 +0000
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave.bueso@...il.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Jonathan Gonzalez" <jgonzalez@...ets.cl>
Subject: ipc msg now works (was Re: ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7?)
On 09/03/2013 03:47 PM, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Hi Vineet,
>
> On 09/03/2013 11:51 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On 09/03/2013 02:53 PM, Manfred Spraul wrote:
>>> The access to msq->q_cbytes is not protected.
>>>
>>> Vineet, could you try to move the test for free space after ipc_lock?
>>> I.e. the lock must not get dropped between testing for free space and
>>> enqueueing the messages.
>> Hmm, the code movement is not trivial. I broke even the simplest of cases (patch
>> attached). This includes the additional change which Linus/Davidlohr had asked for.
> The attached patch should work. Could you try it?
>
Yes this did the trick, now the default config of 100k iterations + 16 processes
runs to completion.
Thx,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists