[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130903113151.GE15824@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:01:51 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Lu Jingchang-B35083 <B35083@...escale.com>
Cc: "shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] dma: Add Freescale eDMA engine driver support
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 05:43:21AM +0000, Lu Jingchang-B35083 wrote:
> Do you mean the DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG device_control? Yeah, the slave driver could pass
> the slave_id. But the DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG may be called more than once, and the eDMA
> driver just needs to set the slave id once for any given channel, after that the
> transfer is transparent to the device.
It depends, for a channel requested, if you are only tranferring to a particular
slave device then it can be confugured once.
so
1. allocate channel
2. dmaengine_slave_config()
then you cnan do preare etc multiple times based on need.
~Vinod
> On the other hand, the DMAMUX's setting procedure requires first disable the dmamux
> before setting, then if it is set in DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG, the repeated setting may be
> complex and unnecessary. The channel is occupied exclusively by the peripheral.
> So, according the HW feature, I think the eDMA needs only set the slave id once,
> and since the of_dma helper has pass the slave id in on xlate, we can get and set
> the slave id here. How do you think about this?
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists