| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:24:48 +0300 From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: latest perf code fails to parse existing data file On 03/09/13 15:50, David Ahern wrote: > On 9/3/13 12:40 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> On 03/09/13 00:37, David Ahern wrote: >>> Arnaldo/Adrian: >>> >>> Latest acme core tree fails to parse an existing data file: >>> >>> $ perf trace -i perf.data >>> 0x16b8 [0x40]: failed to process type: 1 >>> Failed to process events, error -22 >> >> I can't reproduce this. The following works: >> >> $ perf --version >> perf version 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 >> $ sudo perf record -e raw_syscalls:* ls >> ... >> $ tools/perf/perf --version >> perf version 3.11.rc4.g31cd38 >> $ sudo tools/perf/perf script >> ... >> $ sudo tools/perf/perf trace -i perf.data >> ... > > Kernel version? Is your kernel side support there? The kernel version is the same as the perf version i.e. 3.9 > > For me data was collected on 2.6.34 about a week ago. Processed fine up to > the point of this patch getting added. Is it only "perf trace" that fails or does "perf script" fail too? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists