[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130903155759.GB14734@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:58:00 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>
Subject: Re: /proc/pid/fd && anon_inode_fops
Hi!
> > We are really stuck with the current semantics here - switching to
> > *BSD one would not only mean serious surgery on descriptor handling
> > (it's one of the wartier areas in *BSD VFS, in large part because
> > of magic-open-really-a-dup kludges they have to do), it would change
> > a long-standing userland API that had been there for nearly 20 years
> > _and_ one that tends to be used in corner cases of hell knows how many
> > scripts.
>
> Actually, I'm pretty sure we did have the "dup" semantics at one point
> (long ago), and they were really nice (because you could use them to
> see where in the stream the fd was etc). It just fit so horribly badly
> into the VFS semantics that it got changed into the current "new file
> descriptor" one. Afaik, nothing broke.
Hmm, are you going to break my exploit?
http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10038/
I'd like that, because I don't think /proc should allow people to
bypass directory permissions.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists