linux-kernel - Re: OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130903172244.GQ31381@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:22:44 -0700
From:	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com>,
	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	"ocfs2-users@....oracle.com" <ocfs2-users@....oracle.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD
	bit set while I was in lock_buffer!

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:42:37AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Am 03.09.2013 05:17, schrieb Jeff Liu:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > It seems like Sunil has fixed a similar issue against ocfs2-1.4
> > several years ago:
> > https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2fd250839d0f5073af8d42e97f1db74beb621674;hp=e882faf84930431524f84598caea7d4e9a9529c5
> > https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=eccff85213d4c2762f787d9e7cb1503042ba75b9;hp=edc147473ffd9c03790dc4502b893823f44a9ec4
> > 
> > The old bug ticket for the discussion:
> > https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1235
> > 
> > This fix is specifically for ocfs2-1.4, but Mark once mentioned that
> > the BUG() there can be removed if we have a good explanation for this
> > sort of behavior, is it time to have it in mainline?
> 
> Hmm, not fun.
> In my case I'm not using NFS or any other network filesystem.
> The OCFS2 is also used in local mode (no cluster).
> 
> What really worries me is that this another proof that Oracles OCFS2 branch is out of sync with mainline.

Can you show me what branch you are talking about here?
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/