[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52262D14.4000907@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:40:20 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, gnurou@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ARM: add basic Trusted Foundations support
On 08/29/2013 03:57 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Trusted Foundations is a TrustZone-based secure monitor for ARM that
> can be invoked using a consistent smc-based API on all supported
Nit: s/smc/SMC/?
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/trusted_foundations.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/trusted_foundations.h
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS)
> +
> +void register_trusted_foundations(struct trusted_foundations_platform_data *pd);
> +void of_register_trusted_foundations(void);
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline void register_trusted_foundations(
> + struct trusted_foundations_platform_data *pd)
> +{
> + pr_crit("No support for Trusted Foundations, stopping...\n");
> + BUG();
> +}
> +
> +static inline void of_register_trusted_foundations(void)
> +{
> + register_trusted_foundations(NULL);
That will cause a hard-fail. I assume that should only happen if the TL
DT node is present; if there's no DT node, it's fine for a kernel
without any TL support to run.
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS) */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists