linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Drop support for Renesas H8/300 architecture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130903193938.GB13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 3 Sep 2013 20:39:38 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Chen Gang F T <chen.gang.flying.transformer@...il.com>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Drop support for Renesas H8/300 architecture

On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:52:17AM +0800, Chen Gang F T wrote:

>   extreme sample: let 'kernel code style' and 'gcc code style' in one file, that will make the code very ugly.

gcc style will make any code very ugly, no matter what (if anything) else is
in the same file...

[digs out the ports history table]
x86:		0.01			[alive]
	i386:		0.01..2.6.24-rc1 [folded into x86]
	x86_64:		2.5.5-pre1..2.6.24-rc1 [folded into x86]
	x86:		2.6.24-rc1		[alive]
alpha:		1.1.67			[alive]
sparc:		1.1.77			[alive]
	sparc64:	2.1.19..2.6.28 [folded into sparc]
mips:		1.1.82			[alive]
	mips64:		2.3.48-pre2..2.6.0-test2 [folded into mips]
powerpc:	1.3.45			[alive]
	ppc:    	1.3.45..2.6.26 [folded into powerpc]
	ppc64:		2.5.5..2.6.15-rc1 [folded into powerpc]
	powerpc:	2.6.15-rc1		[alive]
m68k:		1.3.94			[alive]
	m68knommu:	2.5.46..2.6.38 [folded into m68k]
arm:		2.1.80			[alive]
	arm26:		2.5.71..2.6.23-rc2 [gone]
	arm64:		3.7-rc1			[alive][might eventually fold]
sh:		2.3.16			[alive]
	sh64:		2.6.8-rc1..2.6.24 [folded into sh, nearly dead there]
ia64:		2.3.43-pre1		[alive]
s390:		2.3.99pre8		[alive]
	s390x:		2.5.0..2.5.67 [folded into s390]
parisc:		2.4.0-test12		[alive]
cris:		2.5.0			[alive]
um:		2.5.35			[alive]
v850:		2.5.46..2.6.26 [gone]
h8300:		2.5.68			[moderately responsive]
m32r:		2.6.9-rc3		[alive]
frv:		2.6.11-rc1		[alive]
xtensa:		2.6.13-rc1		[alive]
avr32:		2.6.19-rc1		[alive]
blackfin:	2.6.22-rc1		[alive]
mn10300:	2.6.25-rc1		[alive]
microblaze:	2.6.30-rc2		[alive]
score:		2.6.32-rc1		[abandoned][cloned off mips]
tile:		2.6.36-rc1		[alive]
unicore32:	2.6.39-rc1		[alive][cloned off arm]
openrisc:	3.1-rc1			[alive]
hexagon:	3.2-rc1			[alive]
c6x:		3.3-rc1			[alive]
arc:		3.9-rc1			[alive]
metag:		3.9-rc1			[alive]

Frankly, I would've expected score and lefotvers of sh64 (aka sh5) to be
the first against the wall - h8300 was a bit surprising...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/