[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxjkzhdZqayiD9_f_tD3T9UJC2whVie-0K_bzdpogCF5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:13:45 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for lockless
update of refcount
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> TOTALLY UNTESTED PATCH ATTACHED.
Actually, that was the previous (broken) version of that patch - I
hadn't regenerated it after fixing some stupid compile errors, and it
had the DECLARE parts wrong.
This is the one that actually compiles. Whether it *works* is still a
total mystery.
Linus
Download attachment "patch.diff" of type "application/octet-stream" (6419 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists