[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130903224731.GC1412@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:47:31 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: larmbr <nasa4836@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.cz, bsingharora@...il.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mgorman@...e.de, riel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm/vmscan : use vmcan_swappiness( ) basing on
MEMCG config to elimiate unnecessary runtime cost
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 09:36:58PM +0800, larmbr wrote:
> Currently, we get the vm_swappiness via vmscan_swappiness(), which
> calls global_reclaim() to check if this is a global reclaim.
>
> Besides, the current implementation of global_reclaim() always returns
> true for the !CONFIG_MEGCG case, and judges the other case by checking
> whether scan_control->target_mem_cgroup is null or not.
>
> Thus, we could just use two versions of vmscan_swappiness() based on
> MEMCG Kconfig , to eliminate the unnecessary run-time cost for
> the !CONFIG_MEMCG at all, and to squash all memcg-related checking
> into the CONFIG_MEMCG version.
The compiler can easily detect that global_reclaim() always returns
true for !CONFIG_MEMCG during compile time and not even generate a
branch for this.
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
You're adding more code for now gain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists