linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Move and rename HP watchdog timer driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1378273901.11730.53.camel@x230>
Date:	Wed, 4 Sep 2013 05:51:41 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas.Mingarelli@...com" <Thomas.Mingarelli@...com>,
	"toshi.kani@...com" <toshi.kani@...com>,
	"wim@...ana.be" <wim@...ana.be>,
	"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
	<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Move and rename HP watchdog timer driver

On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 22:43 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> If that is the case, wouldn't it make more sense to have separate drivers,
> one per functionality, plus an mfd driver to bind them all together ?

It'd be an option, but I don't think there's a huge benefit - the
functionality's reasonably related and there's no real internal bus
architecture on the device.

-- 
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>