linux-kernel - Re: [linux-next-20130903] module: broken module versions?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201309042004.BIG69713.QLOFOFOVSMtFHJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date:	Wed, 4 Sep 2013 20:04:03 +0900
From:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:	ak@...ux.intel.com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next-20130903] module: broken module versions?

Hello.

Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> I tried further debugging but not yet successful.

I found what was wrong.

Bad kernel config contained

  CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x1000000
  CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN=0x100000

whereas good kernel config contained

  CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x1000000
  CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN=0x1000000

. I think that there is no constraint checking for these values and resulted in
overlaying something on the kcrctab table.

Now linux-next-20130903 works fine. Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/