[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130904152022.GD28517@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 11:20:22 -0400
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Jan Kaluza <jkaluza@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eparis@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Send audit/procinfo/cgroup data in socket-level
control message
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:58:30AM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:42:26AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Jan Kaluza <jkaluza@...hat.com> writes:
> > > this patchset against net-next (applies also to linux-next) adds 3 new types
> > > of "Socket"-level control message (SCM_AUDIT, SCM_PROCINFO and SCM_CGROUP).
>
> > By my count you have overflowed cb in struct sk_buff and are stomping on
> > _skb_refdest.
>
> For patch1/3 I count 56/48, then for patch3 I get 48/48. Jan, you might
> do the conversion to a pointer in patch1/3 to avoid bisect breakage.
Wait, that __aligned(8) is for cb[48], not for the contents.
For patch1/3 I count 28/48 on 32-bit, 36/48 on 64-bit (or would that be
56 by default on 64-bit arches without aligned specified?), then for
patch3 I get 24/48 on 32 and 40/48 on 64 (or again 48/48 by default?).
> > Eric
>
> - RGB
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@...hat.com>
Senior Software Engineer
Kernel Security
AMER ENG Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635
Internal: (81) 32635
Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists