lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1378312077-28374-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed,  4 Sep 2013 18:27:57 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf tools: Separate progress bar update when processing events

Currently when processing events in __perf_session__process_events
function we we update progress based on the file_size. During the
same processing we update progress bar from within flush_sample_queue
which is based on number of samples count.

Having 2 different based updates is causing the progress bar to
jump heavily back and forth giving not much useful info.

Fixing this by keeping only __perf_session__process_events
based progress bar update. And turning on flush_sample_queue
progress bar update only for final flushing.

This reduces the number of times the progress bar update
function is called and it significantly reduces the loading
time for TUI, where the progress bar update takes quite a lot
of time.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/session.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
index 1fc0c62..4df449c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static int perf_session_deliver_event(struct perf_session *session,
 				      u64 file_offset);
 
 static int flush_sample_queue(struct perf_session *s,
-		       struct perf_tool *tool)
+		       struct perf_tool *tool, bool final)
 {
 	struct ordered_samples *os = &s->ordered_samples;
 	struct list_head *head = &os->samples;
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static int flush_sample_queue(struct perf_session *s,
 		os->last_flush = iter->timestamp;
 		list_del(&iter->list);
 		list_add(&iter->list, &os->sample_cache);
-		if (++idx >= progress_next) {
+		if (final && (++idx >= progress_next)) {
 			progress_next += os->nr_samples / 16;
 			ui_progress__update(idx, os->nr_samples,
 					    "Processing time ordered events...");
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ static int process_finished_round(struct perf_tool *tool,
 				  union perf_event *event __maybe_unused,
 				  struct perf_session *session)
 {
-	int ret = flush_sample_queue(session, tool);
+	int ret = flush_sample_queue(session, tool, false);
 	if (!ret)
 		session->ordered_samples.next_flush = session->ordered_samples.max_timestamp;
 
@@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ more:
 	err = 0;
 	/* do the final flush for ordered samples */
 	session->ordered_samples.next_flush = ULLONG_MAX;
-	err = flush_sample_queue(session, tool);
+	err = flush_sample_queue(session, tool, true);
 out_err:
 	ui_progress__finish();
 	perf_session__warn_about_errors(session, tool);
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ