linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: tegra: support for Trusted Foundations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52277B02.9010707@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:25:06 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
CC:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
	"gnurou@...il.com" <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: tegra: support for Trusted Foundations

On 09/03/2013 08:31 PM, Alex Courbot wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 03:42 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/29/2013 03:57 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>> New version revised according to comments received for v3. Hopefully
>>> it will be good enough to be merged.
>>
>> Aside from the small issue in patch 1/5, the series,
>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> 
> Thanks! I have adressed the issues you mentioned and will submit v5
> soon. Despite the fact this adds some non-Tegra stuff, will you be able
> to take it into your tree, or should I ask someone else?

I would like to see an ack from the core ARM maintainer (Russell) on
patch 1/5 (also CC'ing arm-soc maintainers for their opinion).

If I get that, I think it makes sense to take the series through the
Tegra tree. I can always create a stable branch for patch 1/5 if needed
to resolve conflicts elsewhere (e.g. Russell's trees or arm-soc) and/or
allow other people to build on top of that patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/