[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130904191104.GK13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 20:11:04 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dcache: Translating dentry into pathname without taking
rename_lock
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 03:05:23PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>
> static int prepend_name(char **buffer, int *buflen, struct qstr *name)
> {
> - return prepend(buffer, buflen, name->name, name->len);
> + /*
> + * With RCU path tracing, it may race with rename. Use
> + * ACCESS_ONCE() to make sure that it is either the old or
> + * the new name pointer. The length does not really matter as
> + * the sequence number check will eventually catch any ongoing
> + * rename operation.
> + */
> + const char *dname = ACCESS_ONCE(name->name);
> + int dlen = name->len;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!dname || !dlen))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return prepend(buffer, buflen, dname, dlen);
NAK. A race with d_move() can very well leave you with dname pointing into
an object of length smaller than dlen. You *can* copy it byte-by-byte
and rely on NUL-termination, but you can't rely on length being accurate -
not without having excluded d_move().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists