lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 4 Sep 2013 15:22:15 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, lenb@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
	hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, trenn@...e.de,
	yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
	izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org,
	mina86@...a86.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com, lwoodman@...hat.com,
	riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com, prarit@...hat.com,
	zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] x86, memblock: Allocate memory near kernel image
 before SRAT parsed.

Hello,

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:37:37PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> 1. Make memblock be able to allocate memory from low address to high address.
>    Also introduce low limit to prevent memblock allocating memory too low.
> 
> 2. Improve init_mem_mapping() to support allocate page tables from low address 
>    to high address.
> 
> 3. Introduce "movablenode" boot option to enable and disable this functionality.
> 
> PS: Reordering of relocate_initrd() and reserve_crashkernel() has not been done 
>     yet. acpi_initrd_override() needs to access initrd with virtual address. So 
>     relocate_initrd() must be done before acpi_initrd_override().

I'm expectedly happier with this approach but some overall review
points.

* I think patch splitting went a bit too far.  e.g. it doesn't make
  much sense or helps anything to split "introduction of a param" from
  "the param doing something".

* I think it's a lot more complex than necessary.  Just implement a
  single function - memblock_alloc_bottom_up(@start) where specifying
  MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE restores top down behavior and do
  memblock_alloc_bottom_up(end_of_kernel) early during boot.  If the
  bottom up mode is set, just try allocating bottom up from the
  specified address and if that fails do normal top down allocation.
  No need to meddle with the callers.  The only change necessary
  (well, aside from the reordering) outside memblock is adding two
  calls to the above function.

* I don't think "order" is the right word here.  "direction" probably
  fits a lot better.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ