[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <522793CA.3060002@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 21:10:50 +0100
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/events: Add bounce tracing to swiotbl-xen
On 03/09/13 13:42, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Correct. The double buffering code is being run in lib/swiotlb.c not the
> xen-swiotlb.c. Hence the question of why not move the tracing in there.
I've put the trace to both locations before swiotlb_tbl_map_single is
called, so the same tracer will be hit both with classic and Xen
SWIOTLB. I used 2 different place instead of calling from
swiotlb_tbl_map_single because I want to print out dev_addr, and it's
calculated differently.
> Yes. And please (if it adds a benefit) also for unmap/sync which can trigger
> the bounce buffer.
>
> Or if it makes sense just for the bounce buffer copying - then just
> leave it at that. Thanks.
For me the relevant event was to see when we start to do bounce
buffering. When does it end, or when syncing happens is a different
thing. If someone is interested, they can easily extend this patch with
that.
However one question bothers me: why ftrace doesn't trace these
functions? They are not inlined, static, or marked as notrace.
Regards,
Zoli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists