[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1378325529.13193.8.camel@x230>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 20:12:09 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
To: "jerry.hoemann@...com" <jerry.hoemann@...com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, kexec <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 08/11] kexec: Disable at runtime if the kernel
enforces module loading restrictions
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 14:09 -0600, jerry.hoemann@...com wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 07:50:15PM -0400, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > kexec permits the loading and execution of arbitrary code in ring 0, which
> > is something that module signing enforcement is meant to prevent. It makes
> > sense to disable kexec in this situation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
>
>
> Matthew,
>
> Disabling kexec will disable kdump, correct?
Yes.
> Are there plans to enable kdump on a system where secure
> boot is enabled?
Yes, Vivek Goyal (cc:ed) is working on that.
--
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists