[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52279E1D.3060907@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 13:54:53 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kumar Sundararajan <kumar@...com>
Subject: Re: clock_gettime_ns
On 09/04/2013 01:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:20 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>>> I think that most of the hangup was a lack of agreement on how the API
>>> should work wrt leap seconds.
>> I don't recall this objection. The interface uses existing clockids,
>> so it probably should keep the existing leap-second behavior of those
>> clockids.
>>
>>> I've always thought that the Right Way to represent a UTC time is
>>> nanoseconds since some epoch, where every potential leap second
>>> counts.
>> Check out the CLOCK_TAI clockid merged in 3.10.
>>
> I never really liked that -- CLOCK_TAI doesn't tell what time it is in
> any format that normal people understand.
>
> I'd advocate for going whole hog and returning, atomically:
>
> - TAI (nanoseconds from epoch)
> - UTC - TAI (seconds or nanoseconds) *
> - TAI - CLOCK_MONOTONIC (nanoseconds)
> - a leap second flag.
>
> * There are various ways to define this. My fancy UTC - TAI wouldn't
> actually need the leap-second flag, since the UTC time would indicate
> leap seconds directly. With the conventional approach, someone would
> have to decide whether the leap second count increments at the
> beginning or the end of the leap second.
Well, adjtimex() gives you UTC & tai offset & leapsecond flag in one go.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists