[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21031.39606.16374.72229@quad.stoffel.home>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 16:40:22 -0400
From: "John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dcache: Translating dentry into pathname without taking
rename_lock
>>>>> "Waiman" == Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com> writes:
Waiman> In term of AIM7 performance, this patch has a performance boost of
Waiman> about 6-7% on top of Linus' lockref patch on a 8-socket 80-core DL980.
Waiman> User Range | 10-100 | 200-10000 | 1100-2000 |
Waiman> Mean JPM w/o patch | 4,365,114 | 7,211,115 | 6,964,439 |
Waiman> Mean JPM with patch | 3,872,850 | 7,655,958 | 7,422,598 |
Waiman> % Change | -11.3% | +6.2% | +6.6% |
This -11% impact is worisome to me, because at smaller numbers of
users, I would still expect the performance to go up. So why the big
drop?
Also, how is the impact of these changes on smaller 1 socket, 4 core
systems? Just because it helps a couple of big boxes, doesn't mean it
won't hurt the more common small case.
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists