[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwF+dqSMyGE+3LamM+qSDymieyReYB+RPb8fHTTmntgqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 19:18:42 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
rui.xiang@...wei.com, autofs mailing list <autofs@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] autofs4 - fix device ioctl mount lookup
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> That aside, I'm really not happy with this kind of games; this stuff clearly
> belongs in fs/namei.c where we can simply see the last component. Doing that
> on the level of "let's scan the pathname for slashes, etc." is just plain
> wrong. Let's step back for a minute here; what are you trying to do?
> You have a pathname that should resolve to a mountpoint, without triggering
> automount (or crossing into the mountpoint, for that matter) and you want
> struct path for the bottom of that mount stack? Or is it something
> completely different?
Can we add a LOOKUP_NOAUTOMNT bit or something (not exposed to user
space, only used for this particular kern_path() call). Then, if/when
automount gets called recursively (through autofs4_lookup? Or is it
just the autofs4_d_automount() interface?) it can just decide to not
follow that last path.
Hmm? I don't think we pass in the lookup-flags to d_automount, but
that could be changed. Yes?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists