[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52289E6C.8090301@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 11:08:28 -0400
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random, Add user configurable get_bytes_random()
On 09/05/2013 10:48 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:18:44AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> The current code has two exported functions, get_bytes_random() and
>> get_bytes_random_arch(). The first function only calls the entropy
>> store to get random data, and the second only calls the arch specific
>> hardware random number generator.
>>
>> The problem is that no code is using the get_bytes_random_arch() and switching
>> over will require a significant code change. Even if the change is
>> made it will be static forcing a recompile of code if/when a user has a
>> system with a trusted random HW source. A better thing to do is allow
>> users to decide whether they trust their hardare random number generator.
>
> I fail to see the benefit of just using the hardware random number
> generator. We are already mixing in the hardware random number
> generator into the /dev/random pool, and so the only thing that using
The issue isn't userspace /dev/random as much as it is the use of
get_random_bytes() through out the kernel. Switching to get_random_bytes_arch()
is a search'n'replace on the entire kernel. If a user wants the faster random
HW generator why shouldn't they be able to use it by default?
P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists