linux-kernel - Re: [ 0/7] 3.0.95-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130905225442.GA1358@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:54:42 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 0/7] 3.0.95-stable review

On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 01:28:33PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.95 release.
> There are 7 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat Sep  7 20:27:46 UTC 2013.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.0.95-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
buildbot says:
	total: 88 pass: 63 skipped: 11 fail: 14
which, while not perfect, matches the test results for the previous release.

qemu test runs for ppc, x86, and x86_64 are also fine.

Details, for those who are interested, are available at
http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/