[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130906134706.GA2238@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 16:47:06 +0300
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] staging: zram: minimize `slot_free_lock' usage
Calling handle_pending_slot_free() for every RW operation may
cause unneccessary slot_free_lock locking, because most likely
process will see NULL slot_free_rq. handle_pending_slot_free()
only when current detects that slot_free_rq is not NULL.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
index 91d94b5..17386e2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -532,14 +532,15 @@ static int zram_bvec_rw(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
{
int ret;
+ if (zram->slot_free_rq)
+ handle_pending_slot_free(zram);
+
if (rw == READ) {
down_read(&zram->lock);
- handle_pending_slot_free(zram);
ret = zram_bvec_read(zram, bvec, index, offset, bio);
up_read(&zram->lock);
} else {
down_write(&zram->lock);
- handle_pending_slot_free(zram);
ret = zram_bvec_write(zram, bvec, index, offset);
up_write(&zram->lock);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists