linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 11/13] xen: introduce xen_alloc/free_coherent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Sep 2013 15:59:02 +0100
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"Ian.Campbell@...rix.com" <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/13] xen: introduce xen_alloc/free_coherent_pages

On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 05:43:33PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 07:32:32PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent needs to allocate a coherent buffer for cpu
> > > > and devices. On native x86 and ARMv8 is sufficient to call
> > > > __get_free_pages in order to get a coherent buffer, while on ARM we need
> > > > to call arm_dma_ops.alloc.
> > > 
> > > Don't bet on this for ARMv8. It's not mandated for the architecture, so
> > > at some point some SoC will require non-cacheable buffers for coherency.
> > 
> > I see.
> > Would it be better if I implemented xen_alloc_coherent_pages on armv8 by
> > calling arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops.alloc?
> 
> What does this buffer do exactly? Is it allocated by guests?

It is allocated by Dom0 to do DMA to/from a device.
It is the buffer that is going to be returned by dma_map_ops.alloc to
the caller:

On x86:
dma_map_ops.alloc -> xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent -> xen_alloc_coherent_pages -> __get_free_pages

On ARM:
dma_map_ops.alloc -> xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent -> xen_alloc_coherent_pages -> arm_dma_ops.alloc

On ARM64
dma_map_ops.alloc -> xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent -> xen_alloc_coherent_pages -> ????



> Currently arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops assume cache-coherent DMA. I have a
> patch which introduces new ops for non-coherent DMA but this should
> really be orthogonal to swiotlb. You can basically have 4 combinations
> of coherent/non-coherent and swiotlb/iommu. Mark Rutland is currently
> looking into how best to describe this via DT as it may not even be per
> SoC but per bus or device.

It seems to me that calling arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops.alloc would ensure
that we allocate the right buffer for the right device?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/