[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CE4F663E.7903%Tomoki.Sekiyama@hds.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 15:01:08 +0000
From: Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama@....com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
"vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"majianpeng@...il.com" <majianpeng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] elevator: Fix a race in elevator switching and
md device initialization
Ping: any comments for this series?
On 8/30/13 18:47 , "Tomoki Sekiyama" <tomoki.sekiyama@....com> wrote:
>The soft lockup below happens at the boot time of the system using dm
>multipath and the udev rules to switch scheduler.
>
>[ 356.127001] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [sh:483]
>[ 356.127001] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81072a7d>] [<ffffffff81072a7d>]
>lock_timer_base.isra.35+0x1d/0x50
>...
>[ 356.127001] Call Trace:
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff81073810>] try_to_del_timer_sync+0x20/0x70
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff8118b08a>] ?
>kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x20a/0x230
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff810738b2>] del_timer_sync+0x52/0x60
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff812ece22>] cfq_exit_queue+0x32/0xf0
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff812c98df>] elevator_exit+0x2f/0x50
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff812c9f21>] elevator_change+0xf1/0x1c0
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff812caa50>] elv_iosched_store+0x20/0x50
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff812d1d09>] queue_attr_store+0x59/0xb0
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff812143f6>] sysfs_write_file+0xc6/0x140
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff811a326d>] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1e0
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff811a3ca9>] SyS_write+0x49/0xa0
>[ 356.127001] [<ffffffff8164e899>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
>This is caused by a race between md device initialization by multipathd
>and
>shell script to switch the scheduler using sysfs.
>
> - multipathd:
> SyS_ioctl -> do_vfs_ioctl -> dm_ctl_ioctl -> ctl_ioctl -> table_load
> -> dm_setup_md_queue -> blk_init_allocated_queue -> elevator_init
> q->elevator = elevator_alloc(q, e); // not yet initialized
>
> - sh -c 'echo deadline > /sys/$DEVPATH/queue/scheduler':
> elevator_switch (in the call trace above)
> struct elevator_queue *old = q->elevator;
> q->elevator = elevator_alloc(q, new_e);
> elevator_exit(old); // lockup! (*)
>
> - multipathd: (cont.)
> err = e->ops.elevator_init_fn(q); // init fails; q->elevator is
>modified
>
>(*) When del_timer_sync() is called, lock_timer_base() will loop
>infinitely
>while timer->base == NULL. In this case, as timer will never initialized,
>it results in lockup.
>
>This patch introduces acquisition of q->sysfs_lock around elevator_init()
>into blk_init_allocated_queue(), to provide mutual exclusion between
>initialization of the q->scheduler and switching of the scheduler.
>
>This should fix this bugzilla:
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902012
>
>Signed-off-by: Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama@....com>
>---
> block/blk-core.c | 10 +++++++++-
> block/elevator.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>index 93a18d1..2f6275f 100644
>--- a/block/blk-core.c
>+++ b/block/blk-core.c
>@@ -739,9 +739,17 @@ blk_init_allocated_queue(struct request_queue *q,
>request_fn_proc *rfn,
>
> q->sg_reserved_size = INT_MAX;
>
>+ /* Protect q->elevator from elevator_change */
>+ mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
>+
> /* init elevator */
>- if (elevator_init(q, NULL))
>+ if (elevator_init(q, NULL)) {
>+ mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> return NULL;
>+ }
>+
>+ mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
>+
> return q;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_allocated_queue);
>diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
>index 668394d..02d4390 100644
>--- a/block/elevator.c
>+++ b/block/elevator.c
>@@ -186,6 +186,12 @@ int elevator_init(struct request_queue *q, char
>*name)
> struct elevator_type *e = NULL;
> int err;
>
>+ /*
>+ * q->sysfs_lock must be held to provide mutual exclusion between
>+ * elevator_switch() and here.
>+ */
>+ lockdep_assert_held(&q->sysfs_lock);
>+
> if (unlikely(q->elevator))
> return 0;
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists