[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQXacWEXngMCQeB1CPVxuvL-jNW_MyMcDV-e8tK6DvY3Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 08:46:28 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Avoid doing too much for
spurious notifies
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Sometimes we may get a spurious device check or bus check notify for
> a hotplug device and in those cases we should avoid doing all of the
> configuration work needed when something actually changes. To that
> end, check the return value of pci_scan_slot() in enable_slot() and
> bail out early if it is 0.
>
> This turns out to help reduce the amount of diagnostic output from
> the ACPIPHP subsystem and speed up boot on at least one system that
> generates multiple device check notifies for PCIe ports during
> boot.
>
> Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c
> @@ -542,12 +542,12 @@ static void __ref enable_slot(struct acp
> struct acpiphp_func *func;
> int max, pass;
> LIST_HEAD(add_list);
> + int nr_found;
>
> list_for_each_entry(func, &slot->funcs, sibling)
> acpiphp_bus_add(func_to_handle(func));
>
> - pci_scan_slot(bus, PCI_DEVFN(slot->device, 0));
> -
> + nr_found = pci_scan_slot(bus, PCI_DEVFN(slot->device, 0));
> max = acpiphp_max_busnr(bus);
> for (pass = 0; pass < 2; pass++) {
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
> @@ -566,8 +566,11 @@ static void __ref enable_slot(struct acp
> }
> }
> }
> -
> __pci_bus_assign_resources(bus, &add_list, NULL);
> + /* Nothing more to do here if there are no new devices on this bus. */
> + if (!nr_found && (slot->flags & SLOT_ENABLED))
> + return;
> +
> acpiphp_sanitize_bus(bus);
> acpiphp_set_hpp_values(bus);
> acpiphp_set_acpi_region(slot);
>
why not just returning early before size bridges and assign unassign resources?
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists