[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130906161448.GI1946@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 17:14:49 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: add early_ioremap support
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 10:19:18AM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -877,6 +878,10 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>
> parse_early_param();
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EARLY_IOREMAP
> + early_ioremap_init();
> +#endif
Better with a dummy early_ioremap_init() in the header when
!CONFIG_EARLY_IOREMAP to avoid the #ifdef here.
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/early_ioremap.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
> +/*
> + * early_ioremap() support for ARM
> + *
> + * Based on existing support in arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
At a very quick look, this looks really close to the x86 implementation.
Any reason why this cannot be made generic and avoid duplication?
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists