linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rcu: Is it safe to enter an RCU read-side critical section?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:52:38 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	darren@...art.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Is it safe to enter an RCU read-side critical
 section?

On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 18:40:18 +0200
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
 
> > I can't use plain preempt_disable() in function tracing.
> > 
> > Also, since it's a misnomer to say the cpu is idle in NO_HZ_FULL when
> > we are coming from userspace, can we rename that?
> > 
> > Perhaps we can also have a __rcu_is_cpu_tracking() (or whatever), with
> > the "__" appended that does not do the preempt disable.
> 
> rcu_is_cpu_eqs() is probably better. It refers to other related "eqs" naming
> in RCU APIs.

But that will just confuse the heck out of people. When I see "eqs" I
equate that with "equals". What does the rcu cpu equal?

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/