linux-kernel - Re: [ 00/14] 3.4.61-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <522A1515.8090300@samsung.com>
Date:	Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:47:01 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/14] 3.4.61-stable review

On 09/05/2013 02:28 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.61 release.
> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat Sep  7 20:25:41 UTC 2013.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.61-rc1.gz
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> -------------


3.4.61-rc1 applied cleanly to 3.4.60

Compiled and booted on the following systems:

Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5
HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics

dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for 
this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in 
warn.

Compile tested on Samsung Chromebook Exynos5 (ARMv7):
3.4.60 compile fail - it is not a regression. Existing issue in 3.4.y It 
has to do with missing config selections in arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig 
for this system. Debugging now using the Kconfig selections from 3.10.y 
for this file.

Cross-compile testing: HP Compaq dc7700 SFF desktop: x86-64 Intel Core-i2:

Cross-compile tests results:

alpha: defconfig passed
arm: defconfig passed
arm64: not applicable
blackfin: defconfig passed
c6x: dsk6455_defconfig passed - defconfig isn't supported
mips: defconfig passed
mipsel: defconfig passed
powerpc: wii_defconfig passed
sh: defconfig passed
sparc: defconfig passed
tile: tilegx_defconfig passed

-- Shuah
-- 
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/