lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:04:46 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@...el.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Asias He <asias@...hat.com>,
	Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@...el.com>,
	Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@...el.com>,
	Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@...el.com>,
	Dasaratharaman Chandramouli 
	<dasaratharaman.chandramouli@...el.com>,
	Harshavardhan R Kharche <harshavardhan.r.kharche@...el.com>,
	"Yaozu (Eddie) Dong" <eddie.dong@...el.com>,
	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 3/7] Intel MIC Host Driver, card OS state
 management.

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:41:03AM -0700, Sudeep Dutt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 22:01 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 04:41:55PM -0700, Sudeep Dutt wrote:
> > > +What:		/sys/class/mic/mic(x)/firmware
> > > +Date:		August 2013
> > > +KernelVersion:	3.11
> > > +Contact:	Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@...el.com>
> > > +Description:
> > > +		When read, this sysfs entry provides the path name under
> > > +		/lib/firmware/ where the firmware image to be booted on the
> > > +		card can be found. The entry can be written to change the
> > > +		firmware image location under /lib/firmware/.
> > 
> > I don't understand, is the path under the HOST device, or the Client
> > device's disk?  Why do you need to change the path on the HOST?  What's
> > wrong with the existing firmware path selection we have in the kernel?
> > 
> 
> The path is on the host. The card does not have a physical persistent
> disk device. Our customers like the flexibility of changing the card
> firmware/ramdisk contents and file names for individual MIC cards. This
> flexibility is not possible with a static set of firmware file names in
> the kernel for all cards.
> 
> Once the firmware/ramdisk path under /lib/firmware/ is set up via sysfs,
> card boot is initiated via the "state" sysfs entry. The host driver then
> obtains the contents of the firmware and ramdisk via the standard
> request_firmware(..) interface, copies the contents to card memory and
> interrupts the card BIOS to initiate boot.

So this is really a "filename" that might contain some directories as
well, right?  The fact you used "path" confused me, as that doesn't
usually imply a filename.

And is the "firmware" just the initramfs image for the kernel to boot?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists