lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:29:31 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
CC:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>, gnurou@...il.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: add basic Trusted Foundations support

On 09/04/2013 09:27 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Trusted Foundations is a TrustZone-based secure monitor for ARM that
> can be invoked  using a consistent SMC-based API on all supported
> platforms. This patch adds initial basic support for Trusted
> Foundations using the ARM firmware API. Current features are limited
> to the ability to boot secondary processors.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c b/arch/arm/firmware/trusted_foundations.c
...
> +void of_register_trusted_foundations(void)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *node;
> +	struct trusted_foundations_platform_data pdata;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "tl,trusted-foundations");
> +
> +	if (!node)
> +		return;

If you're going to revise this patch for the comment below, then I would
suggest removing the blank line before that if statement.

> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/trusted_foundations.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/trusted_foundations.h

Do we need to add the following here:

#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
static inline void register_trusted_foundations(...) {}
#endif

So that there is a dummy no-op function for the non-DT-support case? I
guess Tegra always has CONFIG_OF enabled so that call from
mach-tegra/common.c in patch 2 will never be an issue, but perhaps it
might if anyone else uses this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ