linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/5] cpufreq: Split __cpufreq_remove_dev() into 2 parts (kobj cleanup & the rest)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130906195259.26919.98754.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Sat, 07 Sep 2013 01:23:09 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	rjw@...k.pl, sboyd@...eaurora.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] cpufreq: Split __cpufreq_remove_dev() into 2 parts (kobj
 cleanup & the rest)

During CPU offline, the cpufreq core invokes __cpufreq_remove_dev() to
perform work such as stopping the cpufreq governor, clearing the CPU from
the policy structure etc, and finally cleaning up the kobject.

There are certain subtle issues related to the kobject cleanup, and it would
be much easier to deal with them if we separate that part from the rest of
the cleanup-work in the CPU offline phase. So split the __cpufreq_remove_dev()
function into 2 parts: one that handles the kobject cleanup, and the other
that handles the rest of the work.

Reported-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |   65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index ecc55d1..3e5aeb6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1164,22 +1164,14 @@ static int cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	return cpu_dev->id;
 }
 
-/**
- * __cpufreq_remove_dev - remove a CPU device
- *
- * Removes the cpufreq interface for a CPU device.
- * Caller should already have policy_rwsem in write mode for this CPU.
- * This routine frees the rwsem before returning.
- */
-static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev,
-				struct subsys_interface *sif, bool frozen)
+static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
+					struct subsys_interface *sif,
+					bool frozen)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu = dev->id, cpus;
 	int new_cpu, ret;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
-	struct kobject *kobj;
-	struct completion *cmp;
 
 	pr_debug("%s: unregistering CPU %u\n", __func__, cpu);
 
@@ -1236,6 +1228,33 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev,
 		}
 	}
 
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(struct device *dev,
+				       struct subsys_interface *sif,
+				       bool frozen)
+{
+	unsigned int cpu = dev->id, cpus;
+	int ret;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+	struct kobject *kobj;
+	struct completion *cmp;
+
+	read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+	policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
+	read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
+
+	if (!policy) {
+		pr_debug("%s: No cpu_data found\n", __func__);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	lock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+	cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
+	unlock_policy_rwsem_read(cpu);
+
 	/* If cpu is last user of policy, free policy */
 	if (cpus == 1) {
 		if (cpufreq_driver->target) {
@@ -1295,6 +1314,27 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * __cpufreq_remove_dev - remove a CPU device
+ *
+ * Removes the cpufreq interface for a CPU device.
+ * Caller should already have policy_rwsem in write mode for this CPU.
+ * This routine frees the rwsem before returning.
+ */
+static inline int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev,
+				       struct subsys_interface *sif,
+				       bool frozen)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(dev, sif, frozen);
+
+	if (!ret)
+		ret = __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(dev, sif, frozen);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int cpufreq_remove_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu = dev->id;
@@ -2044,7 +2084,8 @@ static int cpufreq_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 			break;
 
 		case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
-			__cpufreq_remove_dev(dev, NULL, frozen);
+			__cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(dev, NULL, frozen);
+			__cpufreq_remove_dev_finish(dev, NULL, frozen);
 			break;
 
 		case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/