| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <522A6412.5070701@samsung.com> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 17:24:02 -0600 From: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, "shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [ 00/14] 3.4.61-stable review On 09/06/2013 05:11 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 04:23:16PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >> On 09/06/2013 12:46 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 11:47:01AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>> On 09/05/2013 02:28 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.61 release. >>>>> There are 14 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>>> let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Responses should be made by Sat Sep 7 20:25:41 UTC 2013. >>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>>> >>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.4.61-rc1.gz >>>>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> >>>>> greg k-h >>>>> >>>>> ------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> 3.4.61-rc1 applied cleanly to 3.4.60 >>>> >>>> Compiled and booted on the following systems: >>>> >>>> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 >>>> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics >>>> >>>> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for >>>> this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No >>>> regressions in warn. >>> >>> Thanks for testing and letting me know. >>> >>>> Compile tested on Samsung Chromebook Exynos5 (ARMv7): >>>> 3.4.60 compile fail - it is not a regression. Existing issue in >>>> 3.4.y It has to do with missing config selections in >>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig for this system. Debugging now using >>>> the Kconfig selections from 3.10.y for this file. >>> >>> Is there a patch I can backport for this to work properly? I'd like to >>> get some type of ARM coverage if possible. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> >> >> Greg, >> >> I did some debugging and found 3.4 needs several patches to that >> made exynos4 support common for exynos4 and exynos5. It appears some >> changes made it into 3.4, at least changing the directory name from >> mach-exynos4 to mach-exynos, however the rest of the support is not >> in 3.4. I identified the following commits: >> >> 6f9e95e6ed34ceff090ec1a1d27dfc85828d1dbd >> 60e49ca654eea42e04912b259fa36bad2c3e56ef >> 20ef9e08d27b3f5e09c32d4d371fa97f610a3069 > > Those three are "reasonable". Cool. I will pull just these 3 patches and see if that works and let you know if it works. > >> b1b3f49ce4606452279b58b17f2bbe2ba00304b > > That just reorders the config options, is that really needed? > > So, with those first 3 patches, does the kernel now work on that > platform for you? > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Yes the last one b1b3f49ce4606452279b58b17f2bbe2ba00304b, is a reordering patch. -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists