[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <522B51A5.4040003@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 18:17:41 +0200
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC: Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] pramfs: inode operations for dirs
Il 07/09/2013 17:08, Al Viro ha scritto:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 10:23:42AM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>
>> +static int pram_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
>> +{
>> + struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
>> + struct pram_inode *pi;
>> + int err = -ENOTEMPTY;
>> +
>> + if (!inode)
>> + return -ENOENT;
>> +
>> + pi = pram_get_inode(dir->i_sb, inode->i_ino);
>> +
>> + /* directory to delete is empty? */
>> + if (pi->i_type.dir.tail == 0) {
>> + inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime;
>> + inode->i_size = 0;
>> + clear_nlink(inode);
>> + pram_write_inode(inode, NULL);
>> + pram_dec_count(dir);
>> + err = 0;
>> + } else {
>> + pram_dbg("dir not empty\n");
>> + }
>> +
>> + return err;
>> +}
>
> ... and here you are paying for delayed removal of entries:
> mkdir foo
> touch foo/bar
> rm -rf foo <foo/bar
> will fail, since opened-and-unlinked file in effect keeps the directory
> where it used to be "not empty" from your rmdir (and rename) POV.
>
Yep. Same problem as before. I think I can move the remove link into
pram_dec_count and I have to modify the evict path, it should be easy to
manage.
Thanks for your comments Al!!!!
Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists