linux-kernel - [PATCH] x86/xen: remove deprecated IRQF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat,  7 Sep 2013 08:46:49 +0200
From:	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
To:	konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
	david.vrabel@...rix.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org
Cc:	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/xen: remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED

This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from x86/xen
code. It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.

Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
---
 arch/x86/xen/smp.c      | 10 +++++-----
 arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c |  2 +-
 arch/x86/xen/time.c     |  3 +--
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
index 9235842..71177a9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
 	rc = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_RESCHEDULE_VECTOR,
 				    cpu,
 				    xen_reschedule_interrupt,
-				    IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
+				    IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
 				    resched_name,
 				    NULL);
 	if (rc < 0)
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
 	rc = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR,
 				    cpu,
 				    xen_call_function_interrupt,
-				    IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
+				    IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
 				    callfunc_name,
 				    NULL);
 	if (rc < 0)
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	debug_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "debug%d", cpu);
 	rc = bind_virq_to_irqhandler(VIRQ_DEBUG, cpu, xen_debug_interrupt,
-				     IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NOBALANCING,
+				     IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NOBALANCING,
 				     debug_name, NULL);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		goto fail;
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
 	rc = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR,
 				    cpu,
 				    xen_call_function_single_interrupt,
-				    IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
+				    IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
 				    callfunc_name,
 				    NULL);
 	if (rc < 0)
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
 	rc = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_IRQ_WORK_VECTOR,
 				    cpu,
 				    xen_irq_work_interrupt,
-				    IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
+				    IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
 				    callfunc_name,
 				    NULL);
 	if (rc < 0)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
index 0438b93..d1a3064 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void xen_init_lock_cpu(int cpu)
 	irq = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_SPIN_UNLOCK_VECTOR,
 				     cpu,
 				     dummy_handler,
-				     IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
+				     IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
 				     name,
 				     NULL);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
index ee36589..12a1ca7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
@@ -443,8 +443,7 @@ void xen_setup_timer(int cpu)
 		name = "<timer kasprintf failed>";
 
 	irq = bind_virq_to_irqhandler(VIRQ_TIMER, cpu, xen_timer_interrupt,
-				      IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_PERCPU|
-				      IRQF_NOBALANCING|IRQF_TIMER|
+				      IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING|IRQF_TIMER|
 				      IRQF_FORCE_RESUME,
 				      name, NULL);
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/