[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130908045422.GA31896@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 14:54:22 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: race condition in crypto larval handling
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 02:37:03PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 08:34:15PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > However, I noticed on the "good" path (even without the above patch),
> > I sometimes see a double-kfree triggered by the modprobe process. I
> > can't, however, see how that's happening, since larval_destroy should
> > only be called when refcnt == 0.
>
> Do you still see this double free with this patch? Without the
> patch it is completely expected as killing the same lavral twice
> will cause memory corruption leading to all sorts of weirdness,
> even if you stop it from deleting the list entry twice.
Actually I know what it is. sha512 registers two algorithms.
Therefore, it will create two larvals in sequence and then destroy
them in turn. So it's not a double free at all. If you put a
printk in crypto_larval_alloc that should confirm this.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists