[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6A5E49EE-3729-4825-AF31-CF03DDD92E64@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 22:24:05 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
avi.kivity@...il.com, mtosatti@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: MMU: fix the count of spte number
On Sep 8, 2013, at 10:01 PM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 09:55:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 06:29:04PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>> If the desc is the last one and it is full, its sptes is not counted
>>>>
>>> Hmm, if desc is not full but it is not the last one all sptes after the
>>> desc are not counted too.
>>
>> But the desc must be the last one if it's not full since we always add
>> new entry or delete entry from the last desc.
>>
> Why do we alway delete entries from last desc? We delete them from the
> desc we found them in. Current code does not try to move entries between
> descs, only inside a desc.
Oh, yes. Sorry, my memory is wrong… :(
So, currently there has some gaps in desc and it wastes memory. Can not fix
them with simple change and i think it is not worthy to fix them separately since
after my new algorithm, these should all be fixed… so how about just drop this
fix?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists