[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:49:33 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, build: move build output statistics away from stderr
* Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> When building on x86, the final image building step always emits stats
> to stderr, even though this information is neither a warning nor an error:
>
> BUILD arch/x86/boot/bzImage
> Setup is 16188 bytes (padded to 16384 bytes).
> System is 6368 kB
> CRC cbe50c61
>
> Validating automated builds would be cleaner if stderr did not have to
> filter out these lines. Instead, change how tools/build is called, and
> make the zoffset header unconditional, and write to a specified file
> instead of to stdout, which can then be used for statistics, leaving
> stderr open for legitimate warnings and errors, like the output from
> die().
Nice, that output to stderr was always somewhat annoying.
> + /* Catch any delayed write failures */
> + if (fclose(dest))
> + die("Writing image failed");
> +
> close(fd);
Looks like the new code is not just reporting errors better, but it's more
robust by catching and reporting fclose()-time failures as well, avoiding
a corrupt kernel image in certain corner cases - the most common being a
file system full error I suspect.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists