[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 12:02:57 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>,
Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@....net>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: "Virtual" Interrupts -- Need help please
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 05:35:56PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Please fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs, not doing this
makes your mail very hard to read. It looks like your mailer has also
reflowed Daniel's mail.
> On 09/08/2013 04:50 PM, Daniel Santos wrote:
> >Even better, thank you very much!! If this thing had more EEPROM
> >storage I would consider using the OF format for it's settings, but I
> >only have 256 bytes to play with so I'm using a custom
> >compression/encoding.
> You should really use devicetree anyway. How you get it loaded on
> demand is another question. Lack of storage is not a reason. Custom
> data will likely not be accepted upstream, if you had that in mind.
If it's embedded into the device that shouldn't be such a problem -
especially for something on a pluggable bus that could be used with any
architecture device tree is pretty much a secondary concern. Device
tree is far from universal and the main concern where it is used is
with avoiding static board files.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists