[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:56:22 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@...itan.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arm@...nel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, linux-ar@...per.es
Subject: Re: RFC: [PATCH] clocksource: tcb: fix min_delta calculation
On 09/09/2013 10:18 AM, Ronald Wahl wrote:
> On 20.06.2013 17:00, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> Hello Thomas,
>>
>> On 04/25/2013 04:53 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>> On 04/25/2013 04:21 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>>>> The commit
>>>>>
>>>>> 77cc982 clocksource: use clockevents_config_and_register()
>>>>> where possible
>>>>>
>>>>> switches from manually calculating min_delta_ns (and others) and
>>>>> clockevents_register_device() to automatic calculation via
>>>>> clockevents_config_and_register(). During this conversation the "+
>>>>> 1" in
>>>>>
>>>>> min_delta_ns = clockevent_delta2ns(1, &clkevt.clkevt) + 1;
>>>>>
>>>>> was lost. This leads to problems with schedule_delayed_work() with
>>>>> a delay of
>>>>> "1". Resulting in the work not scheduled in time.
>>>>
>>>> Errm. How is schedule_delayed_work() related to this?
>
> I also stumbled over this issue now after upgrading from 3.4.57 to
> 3.10.10. Even sleep() is unreliable - sleeping for 2 seconds often
> sleeps just more than 3 seconds.
>
> The now lost +1 has actually been added in 2007 to solve a rounding issue:
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/549744
>
> So I think this should either be fixed by always rounding up in
> clockevent_delta2ns() or by adding +1 to the min_delta_ns in the
> clockevents_config_and_register() function. Dunno if rounding up will
> cause problems with the max_delta_ns as it might be too big then so
> probably the second approach is better.
>
> Opinions?
Thomas, any thoughts on this?
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (260 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists