[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 07:11:11 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/25] perf tool: Add support for multiple data file
storage
On 9/9/13 7:03 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> my usage currently is to having this running during the day:
> (well whenever I remember to run it.. ;-) )
>
> [jolsa@...va perf]$ sudo ./perf record -g -M 1m -a
>
> and checking report when the system or app get stuck
>
> with multiple files I can just easily (or automaticaly)
> remove old ones without restarting session
Aren't you losing potentially important events by doing that -- FORK,
COMM, MMAP?
I have a flight recorder style command that address this problem
(long-running/daemons) by processing task events and then stashing the
sample events on a time-ordered list with chopping to maintain the time
window.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists