[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 10:53:14 -0400
From: Milosz Tanski <milosz@...in.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: sprabhu@...hat.com, ceph-devel <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>,
Hongyi Jia <jiayisuse@...il.com>,
"linux-cachefs@...hat.com" <linux-cachefs@...hat.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ceph: fscache support & upstream changes
David,
I guess that's really a better question for Sage. He sent my branch
(which includes your changes) plus a whole slew of things over to
Linus. I'm going guess that a small follow on patch is simplest but
I'll let him comment.
Here's the original pull request:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137849853203101&w=2
Also, so far after making this change everything is peachy and theres
no other regressions.
P.S: This is a resend because I did no hit reply to ALL, sorry for the
spam David.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:18 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Milosz Tanski <milosz@...in.com> wrote:
>
>> I think that change does the trick. I had it running on the same
>> machine for 5 hours and had the kernel forcefully drop some of the
>> inodes in the cache (via drop caches) without a crash. I'll send a
>> proper patch email after you take a look and make sure I did the right
>> thing.
>
> Do you mind if I roll your change directly into my patch and reissue the set?
> Or would you rather have an extra patch at this time?
>
> David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists