lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:35:12 +0900 From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> To: 'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 'Alessandro Zummo' <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, 'Xianglong Du' <Xianglong.Du@....com>, 'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@...sung.com> Subject: [PATCH] rtc: sirfsoc: Remove casting the return value which is a void pointer Casting the return value which is a void pointer is redundant. The conversion from void pointer to any other pointer type is guaranteed by the C programming language. Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> --- drivers/rtc/rtc-sirfsoc.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sirfsoc.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sirfsoc.c index aa7ed4b..cbda8e4 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sirfsoc.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sirfsoc.c @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int sirfsoc_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, unsigned long rtc_alarm, rtc_count; struct sirfsoc_rtc_drv *rtcdrv; - rtcdrv = (struct sirfsoc_rtc_drv *)dev_get_drvdata(dev); + rtcdrv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); local_irq_disable(); @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int sirfsoc_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, { unsigned long rtc_status_reg, rtc_alarm; struct sirfsoc_rtc_drv *rtcdrv; - rtcdrv = (struct sirfsoc_rtc_drv *)dev_get_drvdata(dev); + rtcdrv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); if (alrm->enabled) { rtc_tm_to_time(&(alrm->time), &rtc_alarm); @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int sirfsoc_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, { unsigned long tmp_rtc = 0; struct sirfsoc_rtc_drv *rtcdrv; - rtcdrv = (struct sirfsoc_rtc_drv *)dev_get_drvdata(dev); + rtcdrv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); /* * This patch is taken from WinCE - Need to validate this for * correctness. To work around sirfsoc RTC counter double sync logic @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int sirfsoc_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, { unsigned long rtc_time; struct sirfsoc_rtc_drv *rtcdrv; - rtcdrv = (struct sirfsoc_rtc_drv *)dev_get_drvdata(dev); + rtcdrv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); rtc_tm_to_time(tm, &rtc_time); @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int sirfsoc_rtc_thaw(struct device *dev) { u32 tmp; struct sirfsoc_rtc_drv *rtcdrv; - rtcdrv = (struct sirfsoc_rtc_drv *)dev_get_drvdata(dev); + rtcdrv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); /* * if resume from snapshot and the rtc power is losed, -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists