[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <522EC22E.8080805@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:54:38 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/25] perf tool: Add support for multiple data file
storage
On 09/09/13 14:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> hi,
>> sending the support for multiple file storage. Initial
>> RFC is here:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137408381902423&w=2
>>
>> v2 changes:
>> - reworked perf mmap size setup to be able to get
>> the mmap size value easily later
>> - added perf.data read/write test for v2 and v3
>> for both endianity
>> - added record '-M time' support
>
> So this 0/n post seems to have forgotten to list the rationale for doing
> all this..
>
> The only reason I wanted this is so that each thread can write its own
> data. The current one file thing is an immense bottle-neck for big
> machines.
Do you need multiple files for that? Why not just feed writes to a pool of
threads?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists