| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:31:55 +0100 From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> Subject: [PATCH 15/50] sched: numa: Correct adjustment of numa_scan_period numa_scan_period is in milliseconds, not jiffies. Properly placed pages slow the scanning rate but adding 10 jiffies to numa_scan_period means that the rate scanning slows depends on HZ which is confusing. Get rid of the jiffies_to_msec conversion and treat it as ms. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 23fd1f3..29ba117 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ void task_numa_fault(int node, int pages, bool migrated) p->numa_scan_period_max = task_scan_max(p); p->numa_scan_period = min(p->numa_scan_period_max, - p->numa_scan_period + jiffies_to_msecs(10)); + p->numa_scan_period + 10); } task_numa_placement(p); -- 1.8.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists