[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1378807092-28674-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:58:12 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] alpha: perf: fix out-of-bounds array access triggered from raw event
Vince's perf fuzzer uncovered the following issue on Alpha:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffbfe4e46a0e8
CPU 0 perf_fuzzer(1278): Oops 0
pc = [<fffffc000031fbc0>] ra = [<fffffc000031ff54>] ps = 0007 Not tainted
pc is at alpha_perf_event_set_period+0x60/0xf0
ra is at alpha_pmu_enable+0x1a4/0x1c0
v0 = 0000000000000000 t0 = 00000000000fffff t1 = fffffc007b3f5800
t2 = fffffbff275faa94 t3 = ffffffffc9b9bd89 t4 = fffffbfe4e46a098
t5 = 0000000000000020 t6 = fffffbfe4e46a0b8 t7 = fffffc007f4c8000
s0 = 0000000000000000 s1 = fffffc0001b0c018 s2 = fffffc0001b0c020
s3 = fffffc007b3f5800 s4 = 0000000000000001 s5 = ffffffffc9b9bd85
s6 = 0000000000000001
a0 = 0000000000000006 a1 = fffffc007b3f5908 a2 = fffffbfe4e46a098
a3 = 00000005000108c0 a4 = 0000000000000000 a5 = 0000000000000000
t8 = 0000000000000001 t9 = 0000000000000001 t10= 0000000027829f6f
t11= 0000000000000020 pv = fffffc000031fb60 at = fffffc0000950900
gp = fffffc0000940900 sp = fffffc007f4cbca8
Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
Trace:
[<fffffc000031ff54>] alpha_pmu_enable+0x1a4/0x1c0
[<fffffc000039f4e8>] perf_pmu_enable+0x48/0x60
[<fffffc00003a0d6c>] __perf_install_in_context+0x15c/0x230
[<fffffc000039d1f0>] remote_function+0x80/0xa0
[<fffffc00003a0c10>] __perf_install_in_context+0x0/0x230
[<fffffc000037b7e4>] smp_call_function_single+0x1b4/0x1d0
[<fffffc000039bb70>] task_function_call+0x60/0x80
[<fffffc00003a0c10>] __perf_install_in_context+0x0/0x230
[<fffffc000039bb44>] task_function_call+0x34/0x80
[<fffffc000039d3fc>] perf_install_in_context+0x9c/0x150
[<fffffc00003a0c10>] __perf_install_in_context+0x0/0x230
[<fffffc00003a5100>] SYSC_perf_event_open+0x360/0xac0
[<fffffc00003110c4>] entSys+0xa4/0xc0
This is due to the raw event encoding being used as an index directly
into the ev67_mapping array, rather than being validated against the
ev67_pmc_event_type enumeration instead. Unlike other architectures,
which allow raw events to propagate into the hardware counters with
little interference, the limited number of events on Alpha and the
strict event <-> counter relationships mean that raw events actually
correspond to the Linux-specific Alpha events, rather than anything
defined by the architecture.
This patch adds a new callback to alpha_pmu_t for validating the raw
event encoding with the Linux event types for the PMU, preventing the
out-of-bounds array access.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
---
arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c
index d821b17..c52e7f0 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ struct alpha_pmu_t {
long pmc_left[3];
/* Subroutine for allocation of PMCs. Enforces constraints. */
int (*check_constraints)(struct perf_event **, unsigned long *, int);
+ /* Subroutine for checking validity of a raw event for this PMU. */
+ int (*raw_event_valid)(u64 config);
};
/*
@@ -203,6 +205,12 @@ success:
}
+static int ev67_raw_event_valid(u64 config)
+{
+ return config >= EV67_CYCLES && config < EV67_LAST_ET;
+};
+
+
static const struct alpha_pmu_t ev67_pmu = {
.event_map = ev67_perfmon_event_map,
.max_events = ARRAY_SIZE(ev67_perfmon_event_map),
@@ -211,7 +219,8 @@ static const struct alpha_pmu_t ev67_pmu = {
.pmc_count_mask = {EV67_PCTR_0_COUNT_MASK, EV67_PCTR_1_COUNT_MASK, 0},
.pmc_max_period = {(1UL<<20) - 1, (1UL<<20) - 1, 0},
.pmc_left = {16, 4, 0},
- .check_constraints = ev67_check_constraints
+ .check_constraints = ev67_check_constraints,
+ .raw_event_valid = ev67_raw_event_valid,
};
@@ -609,7 +618,9 @@ static int __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
} else if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE) {
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
} else if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_RAW) {
- ev = attr->config & 0xff;
+ if (!alpha_pmu->raw_event_valid(attr->config))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ ev = attr->config;
} else {
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists