[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwmEQeF+PtM7cuaQ8OkuTS=R4JJ61Wwfv8u-Svo-V3KwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:34:52 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] preempt_count rework -v2
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> +static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
> +{
> + unsigned char c;
> +
> + asm ("decl " __percpu_arg(0) "; sete %1"
> + : "+m" (__preempt_count), "=qm" (c));
> +
> + return c != 0;
> +}
>
> And that's where the sete and test originates from.
We could make this use "asm goto" instead.
An "asm goto" cannot have outputs, but this particular one doesn't
_need_ outputs. You could mark the preempt_count memory as an input,
and then have a memory clobber. I think you need the memory clobber
anyway for that preempt-count thing.
So I _think_ something like
static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
{
asm goto("decl " __percpu_arg(0) "\n\t"
"je %l[became_zero]"
: :"m" (__preempt_count):"memory":became_zero);
return 0;
became_zero:
return 1;
}
would work.
You need to wrap it in
#ifdef CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO
and then have the old "sete" version for older compilers, but for
newer ones you'd get pretty much perfect code. UNTESTED.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists