linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/38] ARM: ux500: CONFIG: Enable ST's IIO Accelerometer Sensors by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOesGMhSLnSeJ29zYf0kjxDWEtN5gwmumOgJFKUruYACaB9Dzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:51:14 -0700
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	jic23@....ac.uk, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	LinusW <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, denis.ciocca@...com,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/38] ARM: ux500: CONFIG: Enable ST's IIO Accelerometer
 Sensors by default

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:

>> splitting this and the other config update into two patches? Really?
>
> I haven't split anything. I created the patches as I was
> enabling/testing the drivers, which was at completely different
> times. The only reason they're close together in the set is because I
> reorganised it and didn't think it was necessary to squash them
> together.

In this case, squashing makes a lot of sense. But you could even have
LinusW do that for you when he pulls in the various config updates for
next release.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/