linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: add support for configuring turn-on time through constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:38:30 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
	mark.rutland@....com, rob@...dley.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: add support for configuring turn-on
 time through constraints

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:34:13AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> I notice there's a regulator-ramp-delay property, already documented
> right above this new property. Is this a conflicting usage of the same
> term, or should that existing property just be used in this case too?

That's for a ramp between two voltages rather than the on/off voltage,
though I had forgotten about it.  Hrm.  enable-ramp-delay?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)