[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130910173830.GA4708@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:38:30 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
mark.rutland@....com, rob@...dley.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: add support for configuring turn-on
time through constraints
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:34:13AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> I notice there's a regulator-ramp-delay property, already documented
> right above this new property. Is this a conflicting usage of the same
> term, or should that existing property just be used in this case too?
That's for a ramp between two voltages rather than the on/off voltage,
though I had forgotten about it. Hrm. enable-ramp-delay?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists